The recent reforms to social care in England should pose serious questions closer to home. Changes and reforms to health and social care all too often get hung up on bricks and mortar at the expense of focussing on the quality of care.
In particular, the dominant perception of care services for older people has become synonymous with institutional care provided by private companies.
That raises a number of fundamental questions, not least of which is whether institutional care is the best option for the care of a growing elderly population
Clearly it is not. If all we can offer an ageing population is to put them in a home then we need to re-evaluate our approach.
Given the opportunity, the majority of people would prefer to be supported in their own home, if that is possible. Once we accept that principle, we need to ensure that not only is that service provided but that it is provided to the highest possible standard in the most innovative, flexible and inclusive manner possible.
To achieve that, NHS staff should do what they do best – provide care. While the fundamental responsibility for resourcing and providing social care rests with the state, there are many additional aspects to supporting people to live in their own homes and communities than can and should be provided by a combination of voluntary and community groups, social enterprises and families.
Issues of social isolation, mobility, access, contact, involvement and the pursuit of interests are all part of the care requirement and need to be planned, structured, funded and delivered as an integral part of the care of older people at home and in the community.
Communities, and all that they comprise, have a social responsibility to older people. A number of European and north American cities have developed Older Aware environments in which entire communities – social, cultural, educational and recreational organisations, voluntary, community and religious groups, businesses and statutory bodies undergo training and awareness and work together to help provide a community which understands, empathises and actively supports older people as active and involved citizens.
Supporting older people to live in their own homes and communities should be a social care priority. It must be resourced and supported with research and best practice and is provided by a workforce which is trained, well-paid, has a clear career path and is encouraged to excel.
Older care in the community must never become a cliché or a soft option. It is neither. Trusts and trust staff must seek to provide not just good care but the best care. We can and should become an exemplar for the design, and delivery of the care of older people – primarily in their own home for as long as that is possible.
Hospitals and the medical model still dominate our health and social care thinking. That cycle, and the vested interests which it serves, needs to be broken.
A wide range of factors impact upon dependency levels as people grow older. Housing, employment, education, lifestyle and diet throughout our lifetime will all have an impact on our level of dependency as we grow older. Investment in our environment, our opportunities and in our awareness and understanding of health and well-being can have a massive impact on the type of older people we will become and the level of dependency we display. Health prevention resources and culture are still not in sync with that reality.
We are still too happy to wait until people become ill and then seek to cure them. Similarly we wait until people become old and dependent before we start to address and plan for their care. We need to rethink almost everything we know about care for older people.
We need to challenge our own assumptions and contest those of health and social care planners and policy makers. We need to recognise and support the fact that people want to remain as long as possible in their own home and their own community.
We must design and deliver services best placed to achieve that. We need to align all the resources of our society and channel them to that end. That approach is not only desirable – it is achievable.